thinking art beyond representation
how could it happen that in thinking about art, in reading
the art object, we missed what art does best? in fact we missed that which
defines art: the aesthetic because art is not an object amongst others, at
least not an object of knowledge (or not only an object of knowledge).
rather, art does something else. Indeed, art is precisely
antithetical to knowledge. which is to say that art might well be a part of the
world (after all it is a made thing), but at the same time it is apart from the
world. and this apart-ness, however it is theorised, is what constitutes art's
importance.
Comments
Post a Comment